HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Discus Dancer 44" (Read 5928 times)
kevin m
Forum Moderator
*****
Offline


Glider pilots do it quietly....

Posts: 536
Leeds- West Yorkshire
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #15 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 12:14pm
 
Nahhhh John.  More airfields here - I have one at my disposal 24/7!   
Its flat. Its Yorkshire.  Now what more can a man want?
Will be safe here..... Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #16 - Sep 2nd, 2006 at 7:10am
 
Kev; It is only safe if the Vikings don't come but then again you've Stanford bridge for protection.

How about a world tour?

Ployd
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
kevin m
Forum Moderator
*****
Offline


Glider pilots do it quietly....

Posts: 536
Leeds- West Yorkshire
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #17 - Sep 2nd, 2006 at 7:57am
 
Stamford bridge - ha!  I'm a Yorkshireman, we dont hide behind anyone. ... and if we do, we head to Old Trafford!  A world tour, well I am sure I can get some time off and if you are paying - then book the flights for me!!! Grin
Kev
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #18 - Sep 4th, 2006 at 7:15am
 
Hi Kev
I was thinking of a different type of world tour which allowed you to stay home and saved me a lot of money.

Anyway so much for frivolity. The DD is coming along slowly and has reached the mock-up stage so I can check out if it looks right. A rough calculation indicates that the finished weight will be somewhere between 100 and 110 grams and if I had used a Mark Benns tube, could have got it under 100 which would make it a bit of a floater.

Ployd
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 4th, 2006 at 7:17am by Ployd »  

DD_9.jpg (67 KB | )
DD_9.jpg
WWW  
IP Logged
 
kevin m
Forum Moderator
*****
Offline


Glider pilots do it quietly....

Posts: 536
Leeds- West Yorkshire
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #19 - Sep 4th, 2006 at 9:13am
 
Obscenely beautiful!!!! Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #20 - Sep 10th, 2006 at 7:29am
 
Almost finished! Model weighs in at 103 grams without nose weight.

Ployd
Back to top
 

DD_10.jpg (98 KB | )
DD_10.jpg
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #21 - Sep 19th, 2006 at 7:20am
 
Well folks, it's finished Cheesy  Final weight is 118 grams at a 50% CG. Decided to clean up the wing and forward part of the fuselage pod with a coat of Tamiya Silver Leaf spray laquer which add 2/10's of nothing to the weight.

I have not calculated the wing loading but it is under 10grams/ sq Dm which is an improvement over the Morris Dancer (plans of which I have stared to draw up and it includes refinements not posted on the original thread). Now I need some decent weather to try it out.

Ployd
Back to top
 

DD_11A.jpg (89 KB | )
DD_11A.jpg
WWW  
IP Logged
 
PeeTee

Offline


Men never grow up - just
grow old !!

Posts: 830
Ealing - W London
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #22 - Sep 19th, 2006 at 8:34am
 
Looking good Peter & finished just in time for your summer......although I suppose that you don't get any proper winters in Oz!

PeterT
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #23 - Sep 30th, 2006 at 7:58am
 
The Discus Dancer has flown....of sorts.

Took the model out on Thursday afternoon and gave it a test glide, looked alright, so gave it a gentle heave and it went up to the left, transitioned and stalled all the way down to the right. I put in a bit more right rudder (I had installed about 5 grams of lead on the right wing tip to aid transition) and give it another twirl, went up okay then went into a right hand death spiral. Oh..s**t. Picked up the model and about 2" of the nose had split open (couldn't find the lead shot) so I went home.

I spent Friday repairing the nose and adding more weight (CG now about 46%), increased the longitudinal dihedral about 1 degree and checked the wing for warps. I found that the right wing tip had washin Angry which was quickly steamed out and at the same time I steamed in 1 degree of washout in the left hand tip.

Come Saturday afternoon I went back down to the local park and did several test glides ala Javelin style and now found the right turn was too tight so reduced the rudder offset to zero and gave it a twirl. It had lost nothing in the climb or transition and the death spiral threat had disappeared but the glide is now more open and wanders from left circles to right AND I need a bigger park.

It would appear that the larger span model needs a different approach to trimming than the 36" span Morris Dancer and Mark Benn alluded to this with the big one he is sorting out and I think that some form of warps are needed to control the glide (the left hand wing panels are flat!). Equally rudder trim only needs to be a nats whisker left or right to affect the glide.

This model will need more air time before I can understand what the model is really doing in the first 10 seconds of flight because it will set up everything else, but the glide is a floater Cheesy

Ployd
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2006 at 8:09am by Ployd »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
aprivpilot
Ex Member


Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #24 - Oct 2nd, 2006 at 11:13am
 
"It would appear that the larger span model needs a different approach to trimming than the 36" span Morris Dancer and Mark Benn alluded to this with the big one he is sorting out and I think that some form of warps are needed to control the glide (the left hand wing panels are flat!). Equally rudder trim only needs to be a nats whisker left or right to affect the glide."

Why do you think that there is such a difference in trim approach needed?  Is it a change in launch velocity?  Maybe momentum, with the larger heavier glider being slower to react to aerodynamic forces?

I was  leaning toward the larger side with my first attempt, but maybe I should stay around 36".  I was hoping to have already started on a DLG by now, but my 7 yr. old daughters P-30 is spread all over my workspace and I'm letting her go at her own pace, so as not to discourage her. It may be awhile!

Rey
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #25 - Oct 3rd, 2006 at 7:42am
 
Hi Rey

I am unsure of the reasons for the different trim approach on this model but size maybe behind it  ??? Given that it has a wing area 36% larger than the Morris Dancer for the same weight (120 grams), the loading is starting to come down towards the F1H glider (A/1) regime and will be a bit more efficent aerodynamically hence the trimming rethink. I get the impression that this model will work better in lighter conditions (that was the intent) and a more open glide may be the price to be paid.

Like I said, a different approach may be needed for larger versions but what it should be I am still finding out.

On a different tack, encourage your 7 year old daughter with her P-30, great that she is having a go Wink

Ployd
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
iflyhlg

Offline


Turning the world of  FFHLG
around

Posts: 47
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #26 - Oct 5th, 2006 at 10:23am
 
I believe the reason the model is behaving different is that the speed of the outboard wing tip is much higher than the inboard one and is creating much more lift  which causes the model to roll harder in on the launch. We noticed  that with the RC gliders when we started spinning 360 versus just a tip launch. The tip launch gliders started off around 40 inches but we were swinging them underhand hence the reason for the smaller span. The problem with the smaller gliders was that we were giving up the glide to the 60 inch span gliders. When we started to 360 the gliders we had to go to a longer tail moment and we were using rudder offset to straighten out the launch. Some of the first photos of DLG showed how hard the models were rolling into the circle when we were launching. We also discoved how much our tailbooms were flexing and twisting which led to the search for stiffer tailbooms. And as a personal note Peter, I love your gliders and the building technique that you are using and my only suggetion would be to try and make your sub rudder smaller so it wont overpower the model. I would take it out to a larger field and take a pair of scissors with you and keep trimming off the fin until it wont behave on launch.
   Bruce Kimball Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #27 - Oct 14th, 2006 at 7:13am
 
Hi Bruce
Thanks for the vote of confidence but I have not resorted to any drastic trimming measures just yet until the DD has had some more air time. Speaking of which, I managed to sneak down to the local park during a change in the weather (just had our hottest spring day since records were kept…..36.6 C or just under 100 F in old money  Angry) and got in several flights before the wind came up.

The first flight wandered left and right with a slight stall so I added a poofteenth of right rudder (about 1mm) and tried again, this time consistent right turns still with a bit of stall.

When I got home I added some more nose weight and the CG is now at 45% and I think that will cure the stall. (Wing is set at +2 degrees and stab at – 1) If the stall persists I will consider turbulators (which was suggested in another topic) and un-necessary on the Morris Dancer because the top spar cap was placed on top of the wing surface instead flush.

The model has survived a spiral dive without major structural damage but the launch technique does put the wing under strain to the extent that I have “popped” the top spar cap in several places on the inboard wing (possible from insufficient adhesive) so my tip to anyone building a DLG is to make absolutely sure that any carbon reinforcing is well glued in place because if there is a weakness, the launch will find it!

In terms of practicality, the Morris Dancer (36” span) is the ideal size for DLG (both in transport and material) while the Discus Dancer shows more potential, the wing construction, be it solid balsa or built up requires further engineering as it is still flexible despite the amount of carbon used and the carbon/balsa spar bound with Kevlar as suggested by “FAI” Kev may not be as silly as it sounds. For the construction I use and for solid balsa wings, a vertical carbon spar at least 12 thou thick set along the hi-point line and carbon caps top and bottom would be the way to go.

Ployd
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2006 at 7:16am by Ployd »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
FreeFlightMax

Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 67
Long Island
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #28 - Oct 20th, 2006 at 8:37pm
 
How's the transition in dead air? I'm assuming that you are launching against the wind?
Back to top
 

Max
 
IP Logged
 
Ployd

Offline


T.O.T.H

Posts: 609
Greensborough
Re: Discus Dancer 44"
Reply #29 - Oct 21st, 2006 at 7:13am
 
Hi Max

I cannot answer your question at this stage as I have never had "dead air" to fly in; it's usually 1 to 3 mph when I do my testing and most contests are flown in wind Angry
All I can say is that I try to launch slightly left of wind to aid transistion, launch dead ahead and it will invariably do a big loop (and be prepared to duck!)

Ployd
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print